Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
2.
Radiography (Lond) ; 28 Suppl 1: S59-S67, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1983863

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The impact on the clinical training and education of healthcare students by COVID-19 has been documented. However, the thoughts and experiences of clinical tutors (CTs) about radiography students attending for clinical training and education during this now elongated period beyond first recognition of the virus has not been explored. This paper will discuss data collected from CTs in the UK Devolved Nations (UKDN) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) who were compared because of their similarities in delivery based on individual 'rules of engagement' devised by their various health departments. AIM: The purpose of this study was to examine the clinical tutors' thoughts and experiences of supervising radiography students attending clinical placement during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The UK Devolved Nations (UKDN) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) were selected for comparison on an international level as they are geographically distinct with a comparable population and education accredited/acknowledged by the Society and College of Radiographers (SCoR). Data was collected data from CTs across the UKDN and the UAE. The study used an online questionnaire (Google Forms) with closed questions in four themes including: students' experiences, impact on students' clinical placement, attitude of the clinical staff and the potential effects of COVID-19 on future graduates' skills and competencies. Further data was gathered on the experience of CTs mentoring students during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: Data were collected from 59 CTs (81%, n = 48) from UKDN and (19%, n = 11) UAE. Twenty-seven (46%) respondents reported that COVID-19 had a negative impact on clinical practical experience. However, 32 (54%) identified that COVID-19 had no impact on student supervision/feedback or on clinical achievements. Eleven (19%) respondents thought that students should not have been on clinical placement during the pandemic but a further 51% (n = 30) were happy with the students on placement and expressed willingness to delegate work to students. Interestingly, 58% (n = 34) of CTs suggested that future graduates may need a longer preceptorship after they graduate due to receiving decreased clinical experience during the pandemic. Overall, 78% (n = 46) of respondents thought that students improved their clinical confidence by working directly with COVID-19 positive patients. CONCLUSION: The current study has identified conflicting opinions across CTs in different clinical departments. Whilst some felt that students should not be in the hospital during the pandemic, others reported that working directly with COVID-19 patients had a positive impact on students as it improved their clinical confidence. Despite the challenges presented by COVID-19, CTs were able to provide direct clinical supervision and feedback to students on clinical placement throughout the pandemic. Nevertheless, future graduates may need a longer preceptorship period due to decreased clinical experience during the pandemic. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Clinical placements should continue during subsequent COVID-19 waves of infection or future pandemics to ensure development of skills in resilience and adaptability. Underdeveloped skills due to a decreased range of examinations can be rectified when any wave of the infection subsides by providing tailored training based on individual student's needs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Students, Medical , COVID-19/epidemiology , Feedback , Humans , Pandemics , Preceptorship
3.
Radiography (Lond) ; 28 Suppl 1: S50-S58, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1937106

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The overnight change in hospital practice and service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic raises the question whether undergraduate radiography students received an adequate clinical experience. Many students had their clinical placements cancelled, deferred or replaced with simulated learning. As a way of dealing with the pandemic some hospitals were dedicated to COVID-19 patients only resulting in many elective procedures being cancelled. Many patients also chose to stay away from the hospital out of fear of infection or the desire to reduce the burden on staff. This resulted in a limited range of examinations and clinical experience for those students who were able to complete their clinical placement. AIM: This study aims to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on the education and training of radiography students internationally in the United Kingdom Devolved Nations (UKDN) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), to determine any possible impact on their future careers. METHOD: Ethical permission was sought and granted from the Research Ethics Committees (ID: 21-04-12-02 and ID:21/0032). An online survey was developed using Google Forms and link was shared with students via email. RESULTS: 262 students participated in the study [UAE (n = 60, 23%) and UKDN (n = 202, 77%)]. 72% stated that their clinical skills have improved and 82% were confident in the choice of radiography as a career. Participants from UAE displayed a higher tendency towards anxiety (p = 0.009). Students who were on clinical placements during the COVID-19 pandemic and worked with COVID-19 positive patients displayed less ongoing concern relating to COVID-19 (p = 0.004). 78% of the participants did not require wellbeing advice or request any type of wellbeing support from the higher education institutions (HEIs). Nevertheless, the study found that wellbeing of students was found to be negatively affected during the pandemic. CONCLUSION: Completing clinical placement during the COVID-19 pandemic allowed the continuation of education as students were allowed to improve their skills, confidence and resilience in coping with uncertainties and challenges. Undergraduate students should not be excluded from the clinical department during subsequent waves of COVID-19 or future pandemics to ensure continued workforce planning is possible. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: HEIs should find solutions to compensate students for the loss of practical experience and skills due to the decreased number of patients in some areas of radiography practice. Providing academic and career counselling can assist students achieve their professional objectives and decrease the risk of attrition and problems upon qualification.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Pandemics , Radiography , Students , United Arab Emirates/epidemiology , United Kingdom
4.
European Journal of Molecular and Clinical Medicine ; 9(3):2682-2693, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1820559

ABSTRACT

The availability of different vaccines plays a crucial role in bringing the COVID-19 pandemic to a standstill. All the vaccines with two initial and a booster dose have reduced the mortality rate and do not elicit serious symptoms or illness. However, the clinical trials on different vulnerable populations are still not reliable. In particular, COVID-19 patients belonging to the diabetic population exhibited higher morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the prioritization of vaccination for these populations may reduce further complications. Yet, the hesitancy toward vaccines hinders the process of vaccination campaigns. Hence, this review focuses on the availability of different vaccines against COVID-19 and their role in eradicating previous epidemics. The effect of this vaccination on the diabetic group and the management of chronic illness have been emphasized.

5.
Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care ; 2021(2), 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1572858

ABSTRACT

Background: Case investigation and surveillance is a key step in managing any epidemic. This report aimed to identify the main challenges faced by COVID-19 case investigators in Qatar and to suggest possible solutions to improve the case investigation process in managing future pandemics. Methods: Purposive sampling was used to select 40 COVID-19 case investigators posted at the Ministry of Public Health, Qatar. Interviewees were from diverse educational and cultural backgrounds and had been investigating COVID-19 cases for more than 6 months, at the time of interview. Face-toface semi-structured interviews were done to collect data which was anonymized before analyzing for the purpose of this qualitative study. Results: The most common concern faced in conducting case investigations was language barrier, given the multinational and diverse diasporas Qatar is host to. Authenticity of the investigation was a matter of suspicion for many patients;whereas the majority of the investigators opined that multiple calls received from different healthcare departments asking for information overwhelmed many patients. Laborers/migrant workers often did not divulge information due to fear of repercussions from their supervisors. Social stigma associated with COVID-191 caused reluctance to reveal the index case and close contacts. Information regarding social gatherings attended and public places visited was often concealed (Figure 1). Cultural differences as well hindered smooth investigation in a few cases. Rising case load at times put restraints on improved coordination between different health departments2 and structured guidance for investigators3 about the pandemic response system, which could help to deliver appropriate health services more efficiently. Comprehensive orientation in using the Electronic Surveillance database could also improve the efficacy of epidemiological analysis for improved public health outcomes. Conclusion: Addressing these challenges will help the public health team in Qatar to increase preparedness and efficiency in managing potential future outbreaks, especially in view of upcoming mass gathering events such as the FIFA 2022 World Cup.

7.
International Journal of Current Research and Review ; 13(6 special Issue):S-115-S-118, 2021.
Article in English | Scopus | ID: covidwho-1196188

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) had affected education and learning delivery worldwide. Education institutes faced compulsory transition to online learning systems and challenged by developing electronic/online simulation sessions. Objective: The study aimed to assess the student’s experiences and challenges of using clinical practice e-portfolio during the COVID-19 outbreak. Fifty-nine students were invited to participate in an online survey. Methods: Two focus group discussion were conducted to elaborate on experiences and challenges. Descriptive and thematic data analysis was used to analyze the responses. Results: 78.2% reported that e-portfolios facilitated clinical work organization, 87% stated that e-portfolios improve their professional skills. 21.7% had a vague idea about the importance of using e-portfolios in clinical practice. Conclusion: Positive feedback about student’s engagements with instructors and peers, but technical difficulties were the main challenge. Using e-portfolios improve the student’s learning experiences and support the teaching process. E-portfolio were well-accepted with a sign promising potential for future implementation and improvement. © IJCRR.

8.
Radiography (Lond) ; 27(2): 360-368, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-841511

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the response of the radiology workforce to the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on professional practice in India and eight other Middle Eastern and North African countries. It further investigated the levels of fear and anxiety among this workforce during the pandemic. METHODS: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted using an online survey from 22 May-2 June 2020 among radiology workers employed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey collected information related to the following themes: (1) demographic characteristics, (2) the impact of COVID-19 on radiology practice, and (3) fear and (4) anxiety emanating from the global pandemic. RESULTS: We received 903 responses. Fifty-eight percent had completed training on infection control required for handling COVID-19 patients. A large proportion (79.5%) of the respondents strongly agreed or agreed that personal protective equipment (PPE) was adequately available at work during the pandemic. The respondents reported experiences of work-related stress (42.9%), high COVID-19 fear score (83.3%) and anxiety (10%) during the study period. CONCLUSION: There was a perceived workload increase in general x-ray and Computed Tomography imaging procedures because they were the key modalities for the initial and follow-up investigations of COVID-19. However, there was adequate availability of PPE during the study period. Most radiology workers were afraid of being infected with the virus. Fear was predominant among workers younger than 30 years of age and also in temporary staff. Anxiety occurred completely independent of gender, age, experience, country, place of work, and work status. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: It is important to provide training and regular mental health support and evaluations for healthcare professionals, including radiology workers, during similar future pandemics.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/etiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Fear , Pandemics , Radiography/psychology , Radiologists/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Africa, Northern/epidemiology , Attitude of Health Personnel , COVID-19/diagnostic imaging , COVID-19/transmission , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infection Control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional , Inservice Training , Male , Middle Aged , Middle East/epidemiology , Occupational Stress , Personal Protective Equipment/supply & distribution , Radiologists/education , SARS-CoV-2 , Workload , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL